First, we must condemn violence against women, in case anyone thinks it is not ...
And secondly we are going to the Prehistoric ... since the Pompidou. These two bearded protesters should be protesting against DSK (you know the initials are already a breakthrough) after they rolled in New York. Not to be politically incorrect, so I'm going to a Prehistoric once.
turns out that the discourse about the 'Caveman' has changed so much over the years that it is not clear who they were or what they did. From the noble savage or dried wild, to the egalitarian societies that have used many feminists (and anarchists and communists and todoístas), the image of the 'caveman' is possibly one of the most distorted of Prehistory. If we add to the Welch and the Flintstones ...
The question is ... Why is that? And as always, I respond (mis) education. For some strange reason can be thought Conspiranoids only encourage states, the poor page study of prehistory is not very clear what we are told, or tell us only what matters. Today, it goes without saying that the older the continent lived in Burgos, how they lived. And considering that the only important aspect of his private life, was that they ate each other ...
In conclusion, we have much to convey in order to break the clichés of the past, topics that are still used today marking curious contradictions like the one shown in this photo. In theoretical discourse Paleolithic societies were an example of equality, and even 'matriarchy' (for which it is created). In social discourse, or the street, is still using the 'caveman' club and as an example of sexist abuse.
What did really happened? I do not know, but to see if we agree!