the power of money on individual rights still do not get out of wonder in the paradoxical ad (which was a little over a week) also paradoxical
CONDUSEF dependent SHCP (hacienda here.)
paradoxical because it is assumed (by name), is dedicated to the protection of users of financial services,
what the users what we are? .
Well, wonder in itself is a reference to "new
" record:
REUS (Public Registry of users who do not wish information Products and Services Financial Statements). That of adware is the same as the
spam email but in your phone.
In other countries, the practice is punishable
spam. In ours, apparently not, but they are "taking measure shows" to "protect", how?: Exposing more.
But first things first, anyone remember an article of the constitution, which says something like: "
no one may be molested in his person ... , if not, help:
is Article 16. Well, the adware is curiously a way of annoying.
But what happens, to protect us, and tell them you need to sign advertising that bothers us, not vice versa, they have no idea or little bit is normal, in contrast, believe that we want both their misleading advertising that we will be very grateful because they took the time call our home. I do not believe me, but I feel that right would be the opposite: that you only speak when explicitly asked for information. What nonsense!.
Well, there's not all, we must have all the information centrally so that we know who do not want the above ad, of course, that record will be the most sought-after target, and say there is no worry about that, that information is protected-(I understand that only by law) and that "no other use will be given.
head But what it is? put a jar of honey in the middle of the bears. Sooner or later, through technological or human easier by the part (if not all) of that database is going to compromise, then yes, goodbye to target the same record, and in vain the enormous expense involved in this . If you only intend to protect the use of that record by law, rather than protect individual rights of citizens and not spend a record to menso.
Maybe someone is gullible enough to follow the
CONDUSEF game, but definitely not me. I would venture thinking about how the banks aided by the government have the power to interpret in a certain way (not so logical) some rights of individuals.
